State Rep. Tony Hwang, R-Fairfield, has introduced legislation that would repeal the state’s 2007 In- School Suspension law. The legislation has been submitted to the Legislature’s Education Committee for consideration. Local officials in Fairfield have expressed concerns over this legislation, particularly the additional cost associated with hiring staff to monitor students serving their suspensions on school property. The staff cost to the Fairfield School district for implementing the law would be nearly $70,000 annually.
Public Act 07-66 requires student suspensions to be held on school grounds. Exemptions can be granted if school administration determines that the student poses a danger to persons or property or is too disruptive of the educational process. Prior law defined in-school suspension as exclusion from classroom activity, but not from school, for up to five consecutive days. The act extends this to 10 consecutive days. Under existing law, an exclusion from school privileges for more than 10 days constitutes an expulsion.
Fairfield School Superintendant Ann Clark said the legislation is needed.
“We appreciate the fact that the Legislature wanted us to take a look at school suspensions, particularly for those students who need to be in school,” said Clark, who also serves as president of the Connecticut Association of School Superintendents. “Legislators’ interest in in-school suspensions forced us to revisit, in every district, how we handle suspensions. Having done that, we would like districts to handle suspensions on the local level, rather than based on a state mandate. In addition, in this economy, many districts would be hard-pressed to find the necessary space for in-school suspensions and the staff to supervise the students. So if the Legislature was to continue this mandate, we would hope that we would be given the necessary funding.”
“This law was ill-conceived, to say the least,” said Rep. Hwang. “While the goal of keeping children in school buildings for education purposes is laudable, the impact on local school staff and taxpayers was an afterthought and must be better taken into account in addressing suspension issues.”