When Does a Budget Shortfall Become A Crisis?
In-State Tuition for Illegal Immigrants Will Cost Us
By State Representative Vincent Candelora

As we begin to prepare for a new legislative session in January, the deadline for submitting new legislation quickly approaches.  This past week, members of the Appropriation and Finance Committees received updates on the financial condition of Connecticut.  Not much has changed from projections over the past two years.  We are still facing annual deficits in FY 2011 and 2012 of roughly $3.5 billion in each year.  While Connecticut’s unemployment remains at 9.1 percent, private sector jobs are not projected to return until 2013.  It is clear that Connecticut is in a long term crisis which requires serious attention.  Aside from needing to reduce government and eliminate redundant programs, we must look toward legislative reforms that will prevent Connecticut from relying upon bad budgeting practices.  I am supportive of Governor-Elect Malloy’s proposal to move Connecticut to GAAP accounting.  The significance of this proposal requires Connecticut to account for its unfunded liabilities.  Our current practice only accounts for liabilities that require payment in the current fiscal year.  In other words, no long term liabilities, such as pension obligations or long-term debt service, are accounted in the budget.  Connecticut has a “pay as you go” method of budgeting.  GAAP accounting would create the transparency in budgeting that would benefit anyone.

My optimism of this proposal, however, dissipated with Governor-Elect Malloy’s support for providing in-state tuition for illegal immigrants.  This proposal not only serves as a major distraction from our budgeting needs, but it is based on bad public policy and is a gross abuse of taxpayer dollars.  In the 2007 Legislative Session, the General Assembly debated the merits of in-state tuition for illegal immigrants and approved the measure with all Republicans and some Democrats opposing it.  Governor Rell vetoed the bill, in part due to the cost to taxpayers.  If this measure is debated again this session, I believe it is imperative that Connecticut understand its cost and consequences to the taxpayers.  As we face a $7 billion dollar deficit in the next biennium, we should be concerned with getting our own fiscal house in order.

Regardless of how one feels about the issue of illegal immigrants, this bill has fatal flaws from inception.  If Connecticut chooses to give in-state tuition rates to illegal immigrants, under federal law, the state is exposed to being required to give all non-residents in-state tuition rates.  Connecticut taxpayers invest dearly in our educational system by being one of the highest per capita taxpayers in the country.  This law not only proposes to give tax subsidies to individuals who do not pay taxes, but exposes Connecticut to higher education costs by reducing tuition rates for anyone that chooses to go to a Connecticut school.  The bill will cost us millions in lost tuition revenue.

Previous versions of this bill require that these illegal immigrants make a good faith effort to become legal United States citizens.  By requiring this, proponents argued that the state would be investing in a future workforce for Connecticut employers.  This argument, however, fails to recognize that any person in the United States illegally is foreclosed from applying for citizenship under federal law.  If these individuals cannot gain citizenship, they cannot seek gainful, legal employment within the United States, let alone Connecticut.

In January when the General Assembly is sworn into office, we take an oath to uphold the laws of the State of Connecticut and the United States.  Offering in-state tuition to illegal immigrants flies in the face of federal law and demonstrates a willingness to recklessly gamble our tax dollars.  These bills that encourage illegal immigration to Connecticut is stripping us of our financial check valve, opening up the faucet, and filling the catch basin with more uncontrolled expenses and liabilities.  At what point does a budget crisis become so severe that we, as lawmakers, stop spending your tax dollars on social experiments and begin to tackle the budget crisis?  These types of proposals merely serve to take our eye off the ball and fail to address the real problems.  Lawmakers have a moral obligation to provide a balanced budget without gimmicks and I hope the new administration reconsiders this proposal.

In the 2007 Legislative Session, the General Assembly debated the merits of in-state tuition for illegal immigrants and approved the measure along party lines, with Republicans opposing it.  Governor Rell vetoed the measure, in part due to the cost to taxpayers.  I wrote this article in 2008 setting forth some of the fatal flaws in this legislation.  If this measure is debated again this session, I believe it is imperative that Connecticut understand its cost and consequences to the taxpayers.  As we face a $7 billion dollar deficit in the next biennium, we should be concerned with getting our own fiscal house in order before we begin proposing these new costly measures.

Tuition for Illegals a Flawed Concept

By State Representative Vincent Candelora

The “short” session in Hartford began in early February and will run only 13 weeks.  Our primary goal is to “tweak” the budget and prioritize bills for consideration by the General Assembly.  I’m surprised, therefore, to see the majority party again raise a controversial bill that was vetoed by Governor Rell.  House Bill 5264 seeks to permit illegal immigrants residing in the state to receive in-state tuition rates.  The bill’s stated purpose is to increase access to postsecondary education for illegal immigrants.  I frankly was disappointed at the debate on the House floor last session, which focused on emotional pleas for the students.  I voted against the bill.  It passed the House by a slim majority.  Fortunately, Governor Rell saved the General Assembly from itself and the State from a bad law with her veto power.

Regardless of how one feels about the issue of illegal immigrants, the bill contained fatal flaws from inception.  These fatal flaws will haunt us again.  First, if Connecticut chooses to give in-state tuition rates to illegal immigrants, under federal law, the state is exposed to being required to give all non-residents in-state tuition rates.  Connecticut taxpayers invest dearly in our educational system by being one of the highest per capita taxpayers in the country.  This law not only proposes to give tax subsidies to individuals who do not pay taxes, but exposes Connecticut to higher education costs by reducing tuition rates for anyone that chooses to go to a Connecticut school.

Last session, the bill required that these illegal immigrants would have to make a good faith effort to become legal United States citizens.  By requiring this, the majority party argued that the state would be investing in a future workforce for Connecticut employers.  This argument, however, failed to recognize that any person in the United States illegally is foreclosed from applying for citizenship under federal law.  If these individuals cannot gain citizenship, they cannot seek gainful, legal employment within the United States, let alone Connecticut.

Connecticut is ranked as one of the best states to educate its students.  Unfortunately, our students migrate out of Connecticut at one of the highest rates in the country.  The House Republicans proposed segregating the income tax of college graduates to assist them in purchasing a home in Connecticut in order to stop this “brain drain” and build our workforce.  The majority party entertained the concept and then tucked this proposal on a shelf.  Ironically, they continue to ponder why our middle class in Connecticut is evaporating.

As elected officials, we took an oath to uphold the laws of the State of Connecticut and the United States.  Proposed Bill 5264 illustrates a failure to acknowledge federal law and a willingness to recklessly gamble our tax dollars.  Connecticut needs to begin tackling the tough issues of controlling real property taxes, providing relief for our seniors, affordable housing, retaining college students for our workforce, and access to affordable healthcare.  These bills that encourage illegal immigration to Connecticut is stripping us of our financial check valve, opening up the faucet, and filling the catch basin with more uncontrolled expenses and liabilities.